<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: why ray comfort got the ncse treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/11/17/why-ray-comfort-got-the-ncse-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/11/17/why-ray-comfort-got-the-ncse-treatment/</link>
	<description>exploring science, the strange and the unknown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:51:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russ Toelke</title>
		<link>http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/11/17/why-ray-comfort-got-the-ncse-treatment/#comment-8332</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Toelke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofweirdthings.com/?p=8688#comment-8332</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently found your blog and have become a fan of your writings.
But please, for the sake of consistency, when scolding opposing views as being somewhat less than scholarly (not that I disagree), could you learn the difference between its (possessive) and it&#039;s (a contraction for it is) as well as the difference between who&#039;s (contraction for who is) and whose (possessive of who)?
Maybe it&#039;s just my critical eye, but in a scholarly volley, it would behoove the writer to eliminate any such minor stumbling blocks that show the author in any (albeit minor) lesser scholarly light himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently found your blog and have become a fan of your writings.<br />
But please, for the sake of consistency, when scolding opposing views as being somewhat less than scholarly (not that I disagree), could you learn the difference between its (possessive) and it&#8217;s (a contraction for it is) as well as the difference between who&#8217;s (contraction for who is) and whose (possessive of who)?<br />
Maybe it&#8217;s just my critical eye, but in a scholarly volley, it would behoove the writer to eliminate any such minor stumbling blocks that show the author in any (albeit minor) lesser scholarly light himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
