How do you explain the body reacting so fast. The poison could not have reached the brain within 20 seconds even not in a minute.

Poisons don’t have to reach the brain to trigger the body’s reaction. Your unidentified family member could go into full blown shock within seconds if she’s as allergic to a wasp bite as you describe. The venom just needs to enter her body, period.

Ok now what has happened after he gave her the first drops to have her body to get used to the poison again and have the brains relaxed again so she could move?

Ow. That attempt at an argument made my brain hurt. Many venoms don’t even target the nervous system, i.e. aren’t neurotoxins, so the idea of “relaxing one’s brain” to get patients out of a coma caused by anaphylactic shock is absolutely ridiculous. Only a victim of a brain endema would actually need to have brain swelling reduced. So, the entire premise you detailed here is wrong and you’ve not provided any proof for what you’re saying or any way to verify your story.

Patients in comas can get better on their own and even if your story is a truly accurate account, just a few minutes on WebMD could clear up the “mysteries of medicine” to which you refer and it’s pretty obvious that you’re guilty of confusing correlation with a plausible causation. Often times the two are very different things.

Best regards, and keep your minds open. That will make it a better world.

I’m all for keeping my mind open. However, I don’t want to have a mind so open that my brains fall out and land on the floor with a squishy noise.

read this carefully befor you decide whether it is quack or not. An family member of mine is now for 1 year in semi.coma after the third wasp bite. (the first and second were 15 and 16 years ago)

10 years before she was made immune by it through regular medics.

So you would think no problem?? right. NO BIG Problems.

Now comes the trick: Within 20 seconds she fainted after the bite in her finger tip. After 1 minute she blew up like a ballon. Luckily the paramedics could push a pipe through her throat so she didn´t suffocate.

How do you explain the body reacting so fast. The poison could not have reached the brain within 20 seconds even not in a minute . So how was the response created ?? Not by the poison but by the signals given by the poison to the NERVES.

Why did the body react is such a incredeble way? the normal doctor couldn´t tell my uncle , He told him she was the third woman in existence surviving ther third wasp bite without dying although her hyper allergeic reaction to it (They didn´´t even dare to do a test with diluted wasp poison to check or the immune cure from 10 years ago was still effective.)

Now she is in semi coma and the normal medical world doesn´t know what to except from pulling the plugs so she would die.

Now my uncle has been treating her with, yes homeopathic diluted wasp BEE poison as this is less poisoneous . You people say there is nothing in it right?? Right it is so diluted that not a single molecul is in it Right?? Right. OK now what has happened after he gave her the first drops to have her body to get used to the poison again and have the brains relaxed again so she could move again????

Nothing??? There is no molecul in there right?? right there isn´t.

1 second after giving only one drop she started vomiting and grew like a balloon . But not so severe as with the real wasp bite.

OK could be placebo effect.

Right

Now the second time with this so called nothing water

Guess what happened??

Right vomiting again and ballooning but not so sever anymore.

Could be placebo huh?? OK but how is this placebo effect achieved with somene in coma???

Tell me.

Now she is so far after 1 year that she is able to speak some words again and talk with her eyes. 1 blink is yes ,2 is no, and 3 blinks is yes please.As the talking is to exhausting.

And on command of the care taking people she can relax her whole body for a couple of minutes and is then dressed or washed. The she flips into feetus holding (like an unborn baby)

Normal medicine cannot explain this . She should have been dead 1 year ago.

Now i will not come back on this and please call me liar etc. But how can 1 drop of nothing make her react like she is stung by a real wasp.

Think before you judge about something you have no experience with nor underwenth it.

Best regards ,

and keep your minds open. That will make it a better world.

That’s exactly what I did. It’s just that I didn’t think it was necessary to cite references to very basic middle school science. Concepts like radiation and energy shouldn’t require a big list of citations. Really.

“…a less insulting and dismissive approach must be taken, one that draws them in with demonstration of the mechanical failures of the claims”

So pointing out that how Dr. Benneth described the inner workings of homeopathy will either make a toxic stew that will give you cancer, or just make hot water doesn’t fall into the category of demonstrating the mechanical failures of his claims?

“If your goal is to simply preach to the choir and earn your silver from the ad-revenue that it generates…”

My goal is to challenge people’s ideas, and when those ideas are being used to justify making money from exploiting others with technobabble and quackery, I don’t think I have to be sensitivity and politeness incarnate. Also, as of right now, this blog doesn’t have any ads so it’s hard to see how I’d make money from something that isn’t there yet…

Isn’t the best cure for nonsense ridicule?

You, like they, are preaching to your choir with no capacity to reach out and convert the undecided folk seeking healthy solutions. Belligerent ad hominem will only serve to entrench those inclined to homeopathy, effectively painting you as the evil little tyrant of science who offers no actual science, but insults on their notables and by transference, themselves.

If your goal truly is to educate the undecided and influence the believers of homeopathy, then a less insulting and dismissive approach must be taken, one that draws them in with demonstration of the mechanical failures of the claims, not using vague generalizations, but systematic methods.

If your goal is to simply preach to the choir and earn your silver from the ad-revenue that it generates, please, stay the course.